Browser comparison

DuckDuckGo vs Sill: two shapes of private browsing

This is the friendliest matchup on the list: both browsers are free, account-less, WebKit-based on the Mac, and privacy-first by conviction. DuckDuckGo protects a minimal browser everywhere you go; Sill builds a full living-in-it browser that never phones home. The choice is about shape, not values.

Full disclosure: this studio builds Sill. This is written as the comparison worth reading anyway — DuckDuckGo's genuine strengths included, its details drawn from its own public documentation.

Visit DuckDuckGo’s site ↗Get Sill →

The DuckDuckGo browser extends the search engine's promise into an app: tracker blocking on by default, automatic cookie pop-up handling, Duck Player for YouTube without personalized ads, a Fire Button that burns tabs and data in one tap, and end-to-end-encrypted sync without an account. It runs on Mac, Windows, iOS and Android, from an organization that's spent two decades on this one issue.

Sill agrees with essentially all of that philosophy and asks a different question: what would a browser you organize your whole day in look like, if it were built to the same standard? Its answer adds hibernating workspaces, glanceable favorites, Panel view and developer tools — while making zero network calls of its own.

The quick answer

Choose DuckDuckGo if…

  • You want the same private browser on your phone and every desktop
  • You want encrypted cross-device sync (no account needed)
  • The Fire Button model — burn everything, often — matches how you browse
  • You want Duck Player, email protection and the wider DuckDuckGo ecosystem
  • You prefer a minimal browser from an established privacy organization

Choose Sill if…

  • You live in the browser all day and want rooms, not a single window: hibernating workspaces, Panel view
  • You want heads-up favorites — unread mail counts and meeting nudges, read locally
  • You want built-in developer tools (API client, MCP explorer, Web Inspector)
  • You want the strictest possible network posture: zero calls of the browser’s own
  • You want persistent, organized sessions rather than the burn-it-down model

DuckDuckGo vs Sill: core features

FeatureSillDuckDuckGo
EngineWebKit (native macOS)WebKit on macOS
PlatformsmacOS 14+ (Apple Silicon & Intel)macOS, Windows, iOS, Android
PriceFree (early access)Free
Account requiredNoNo
Open sourceSource on GitHubClient apps largely open source
WorkspacesYes — hibernating workspacesNo
Memory modelWhole workspaces hibernate and release their memory; favorites stay loadedFire Button wipes sessions; standard WebKit tab handling
Ad & tracker blockingBuilt in — ad networks blocked natively; videos never autoplayYes — tracker blocking, cookie pop-up handling, Duck Player
AI featuresNone — routine detection is deterministic, local, and off by defaultDuck.ai — optional, anonymized chats with third-party models
Browser's own network callsZero of its own — no telemetry, no analytics, no accountDesigned to be minimal and anonymous, per its documentation
Developer toolsAPI client, MCP explorer, Web Inspector, JSON tree viewerMinimal — not a developer-focused browser
Sync & mobileNone — single Mac, fully localEnd-to-end-encrypted Sync & Backup (no account); mobile apps
ExtensionsNo extension store (blocking & dev tools are built in)None on macOS

Accurate to the best of our knowledge as of 13 July 2026; DuckDuckGo's details come from its public documentation.

Where DuckDuckGo shines

See it for yourself: visit DuckDuckGo’s official site ↗ (opens in a new tab).

Where Sill shines

The privacy picture

Both browsers pass the tests that matter: no account required, tracker blocking built in, no selling of attention. The remaining differences are architectural. DuckDuckGo operates services (search, sync, Duck.ai) engineered to be anonymous — trust backed by documentation and reputation. Sill removes the question: zero network calls of its own, no services to trust, and its opt-in routine detection is deterministic, local, metadata-only, and never observes banking, health or government sites. If your threat model is "verify, don't trust," Sill is the easier browser to watch; if it's "protect me everywhere I go," DuckDuckGo covers devices Sill never will.

Verdict

Frequently asked questions

Are DuckDuckGo and Sill both actually private?

Yes, credibly, in different shapes. DuckDuckGo blocks trackers everywhere and engineers its services to be anonymous. Sill goes a step further on network posture — zero calls of its own, no services at all — but only exists on macOS.

Does either browser have AI?

DuckDuckGo offers Duck.ai, an optional feature for anonymized chats with third-party models. Sill has none at all — its routine detection is a deterministic local engine, not a model, and is off by default.

Does DuckDuckGo have workspaces or tab groups?

No — it keeps a deliberately simple tab model, with the Fire Button for wholesale cleanup. Workspaces with hibernation are the core of how Sill organizes browsing.

Which should I use on my phone?

DuckDuckGo — Sill has no mobile app. Plenty of people pair DuckDuckGo on the phone with Sill on the Mac; the philosophies are compatible.


Try it yourself:Sill is free early access for macOS 14+ — no account, nothing leaves your Mac.

More comparisons: Arc vs Sill · Dia vs Sill · Zen vs Sill · Edge vs Sill · Chrome vs Sill · Brave vs Sill